free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will J.D. Vance attend the next US x Iran diplomatic meeting?

will-jd-vance-attend-the-next-us-x-iran-diplomatic-meeting · Who will attend the next US x Iran diplomatic meeting? · category: Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Kushner, Politics, Trump, U.S. x Iran, Vance, Witkoff, rubio · resolves
run_id: 0ca0c299-a25d-4853-a605-e88b7a8df78a · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
low_liquidity_efficiency: spread=1.0pp is > 50% of expected net profit (even at f=1.0)
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
DOWN
current / peak
44.2% / 47.5%
move_start
38.9%
reversal
+3.2pp
move size / hours
8.6pp / 26.5h
shape
spike
72h range
38.4%—47.5% (Δ9.1pp)
since peak
0.5h

Price rose 8.6pp from 38.9% to 47.5% over 26.5h (spike), then reversed. Now at 44.2%, down 3.2pp from peak, 0.5h after the peak.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 100 → 4 quality: HIGH tokens: 5040
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
OVERPRICED conviction: HIGH opportunity: SMALL action: NO
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 15155 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = a next US–Iran diplomatic meeting occurs and J.D. Vance attends; NO = no such meeting by the deadline or it occurs without Vance. Trend is UP, pricing in the YES-World. Momentum check: E=2 (US–Iran direct talks confirmed; new Iran advisor appointed), D=3 (Islamabad talks failed; Trump considers military action; “Project Freedom”/blockade pressure) (R=0). Incremental only: E=0, D=0 (priced-in: E=2, D=3). Self-check: no change. 
Theta direction: DOWN
Price move direction: UP (from 39% to 48%)
Alignment: OPPOSITE
Theta: DOWN — opposed
No Strong Divergence exists; instead, the 8.6pp spike occurred without any fresh, resolution-adjacent signals. Notably, there is no announcement of a next US–Iran meeting, no scheduling details, and no confirmation that Vance would attend; the only fresh Vance headline is a domestic Iowa stop, which is neutral to slightly bearish for near-term attendance, while older items about “active talks” are process-only and were already priced in at 39%. Given zero incremental E signals, the move looks flow-driven and has already begun to retrace; expect further mean reversion.

Kill switches:
- White House formally announces the next US–Iran diplomatic meeting with an attendee list that includes Vice President J.D. Vance
- Official statement that Vance will lead or attend the next round of US–Iran talks (with date/venue specified)
- Mediator (e.g., Pakistan/Oman/Qatar) announces a scheduled US–Iran meeting at VP/leader level naming Vance
- Credible pool report or press guidance listing Vance’s travel to a US–Iran meeting
- Photo/video evidence of Vance arriving at or participating in a US–Iran diplomatic meeting
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ low_liquidity_efficiency: spread=1.0pp is > 50% of expected net profit (even at f=1.0)

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.

step post-omit

news watch (A.2 / A.3)

● executed
watch: f274d296
status: ⏳ expired
armed: 2026-05-07T08:51Z
closed: 2026-05-08T08:58Z
polls: 17
signals seen: 0
decision price: 44.2pct