← back to pipeline
mr
Will J.D. Vance attend the next US x Iran diplomatic meeting? ↗
will-jd-vance-attend-the-next-us-x-iran-diplomatic-meeting
· Who will attend the next US x Iran diplomatic meeting? · category: Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Kushner, Politics, Trump, U.S. x Iran, Vance, Witkoff, rubio
· resolves
run_id: 0ca0c299-a25d-4853-a605-e88b7a8df78a
· started
· status
skipped
· planner_skipped
· ✕ planner rejected
low_liquidity_efficiency: spread=1.0pp is > 50% of expected net profit (even at f=1.0)
signal detected
● executed
detect_reversal
direction
DOWN
current / peak
44.2% / 47.5%
move_start
38.9%
reversal
+3.2pp
move size / hours
8.6pp / 26.5h
shape
spike
72h range
38.4%—47.5% (Δ9.1pp)
since peak
0.5h
Price rose 8.6pp from 38.9% to 47.5% over 26.5h (spike), then reversed. Now at 44.2%, down 3.2pp from peak, 0.5h after the peak.
news gathered
● executed
news retrieval (tomographic)
raw→filtered: 100 → 4
quality: HIGH
tokens: 5040
article_thesis
relevant
Vance backs Nunn in Des Moines visit, highlights GOP agenda ahead of 2026 race
article_antithesis
relevant
Texas Hispanic Voters Support Immigration Agenda, Reject Sharia
article_thesis
noise
Criză diplomatică la Vatican! Marco Rubio încearcă să repare relațiile cu Papa după atacurile lui Donald Trump
article_thesis
noise
Rubio expects 'frank' meeting with Pope as Trump takes fresh potshots at Leo
AI verdict
● executed
Prompt-MR · misprice analysis
OVERPRICED
conviction: HIGH
opportunity: SMALL
action: NO
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 15155 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = a next US–Iran diplomatic meeting occurs and J.D. Vance attends; NO = no such meeting by the deadline or it occurs without Vance. Trend is UP, pricing in the YES-World. Momentum check: E=2 (US–Iran direct talks confirmed; new Iran advisor appointed), D=3 (Islamabad talks failed; Trump considers military action; “Project Freedom”/blockade pressure) (R=0). Incremental only: E=0, D=0 (priced-in: E=2, D=3). Self-check: no change. Theta direction: DOWN Price move direction: UP (from 39% to 48%) Alignment: OPPOSITE Theta: DOWN — opposed No Strong Divergence exists; instead, the 8.6pp spike occurred without any fresh, resolution-adjacent signals. Notably, there is no announcement of a next US–Iran meeting, no scheduling details, and no confirmation that Vance would attend; the only fresh Vance headline is a domestic Iowa stop, which is neutral to slightly bearish for near-term attendance, while older items about “active talks” are process-only and were already priced in at 39%. Given zero incremental E signals, the move looks flow-driven and has already begun to retrace; expect further mean reversion. Kill switches: - White House formally announces the next US–Iran diplomatic meeting with an attendee list that includes Vice President J.D. Vance - Official statement that Vance will lead or attend the next round of US–Iran talks (with date/venue specified) - Mediator (e.g., Pakistan/Oman/Qatar) announces a scheduled US–Iran meeting at VP/leader level naming Vance - Credible pool report or press guidance listing Vance’s travel to a US–Iran meeting - Photo/video evidence of Vance arriving at or participating in a US–Iran diplomatic meeting
rule audit
● executed
audit_gate
✓
ALL
trade plan
○ skipped
position_planner
✕ low_liquidity_efficiency: spread=1.0pp is > 50% of expected net profit (even at f=1.0)
the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.
step post-omit
● executed
news watch (A.2 / A.3)
watch: f274d296
status:
⏳ expired
armed: 2026-05-07T08:51Z
closed: 2026-05-08T08:58Z
polls: 17
signals seen: 0
decision price: 44.2pct