← back to pipeline
mr
Will Ivan Cepeda Castro win the 2026 Colombian presidential election? ↗
will-ivan-cepeda-castro-win-the-2026-colombian-presidential-election
· Colombia Presidential Election · category: Colombia, Colombia Election, Elections, Global Elections, Main Election, Politics, Rewards 200, 4.5, 50, World, World Elections
· resolves
run_id: 108d9a7f-0e70-440b-afbe-1dd078dc0b95
· started
· status
skipped
· planner_skipped
· ✕ planner rejected
low_liquidity_efficiency: spread=1.0pp is > 50% of expected net profit (even at f=1.0)
signal detected
● executed
detect_reversal
direction
UP
current / peak
38.5% / 35.5%
move_start
41.5%
reversal
+3.0pp
move size / hours
6.0pp / 41.0h
shape
steady
72h range
35.5%—42.0% (Δ6.5pp)
since peak
21.5h
Price fell 6.0pp from 41.5% to 35.5% over 41.0h (steady), then reversed. Now at 38.5%, up 3.0pp from trough, 21.5h after the trough.
news gathered
● executed
news retrieval (tomographic)
raw→filtered: 12 → 2
quality: HIGH
tokens: 4586
gnews_mechanism
relevant
In Colombia’s Election, Two Conservatives Fight to Face Cepeda - Americas Quarterly
gnews_mechanism
relevant
Colombian Presidential Candidate Seeks Trump’s Help for War on Cocaine Gangs - Bloomberg
AI verdict
● executed
Prompt-MR · misprice analysis
UNDERPRICED
conviction: MEDIUM
opportunity: SMALL
action: YES
override: OMIT_STRONG_ASSESSMENT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 15538 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = Cepeda maintains/extends polling lead and/or rivals remain fragmented; NO = Cepeda’s support erodes materially, or the opposition consolidates behind a single strong challenger. Trend is DOWN, pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=1, D=0, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=1, D=0 (priced-in: E=1, D=0). Self-check: no change. Theta direction: NEUTRAL Price move direction: DOWN (from 42% to 36%) Alignment: N/A Theta: NEUTRAL — no deadline Logical Divergence: Yes — price fell while incremental signals favored YES; no Strong Divergence. The CNC poll wave (May 3–4) putting Cepeda first and competitive head-to-heads was already priced; the only fresh item (May 6, Americas Quarterly) highlights right-wing infighting over who faces Cepeda — a pro-YES development — and there are no ★ DIRECT resolution-level shifts (no withdrawals, disqualifications, or formal coalition deals). Given thin incremental news and a 6pp steady drop, the move looks flow-driven and overstated; partial reversion is warranted. Kill switches: - A new CNC/Atlas Intel poll shows Cepeda trailing De la Espriella (or another rival) in a head-to-head by >3pp. - Paloma Valencia formally suspends her campaign and endorses Abelardo de la Espriella, with a unified right-wing coalition announced. - Prosecutor or court action disqualifies Cepeda or opens a major formal investigation that materially damages his viability. - A major centrist bloc (e.g., Fajardo-aligned forces) endorses a single anti-Cepeda candidate, signaling broad consolidation.
rule audit
● executed
audit_gate
✓
ALL
trade plan
○ skipped
position_planner
✕ low_liquidity_efficiency: spread=1.0pp is > 50% of expected net profit (even at f=1.0)
the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.
step post-omit
● executed
news watch (A.2 / A.3)
watch: f093b81a
status:
⏳ expired
armed: 2026-05-07T08:51Z
closed: 2026-05-08T08:58Z
polls: 17
signals seen: 0
decision price: 38.5pct