free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mom

Will the next diplomatic US-Iran meeting be in Pakistan?

will-the-next-diplomatic-us-iran-meeting-be-in-pakistan-295 · Where will the next US-Iran diplomatic meeting happen? · category: Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Israel x Iran, Khamenei, Nuclear, Politics, Trump, U.S. x Iran, Vance, nuclear deal, rewards 100, 4.5, 100 · resolves
run_id: 12b6b693-ba16-468a-9f98-f5fba89aba5b · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
action_not_tradeable: STALL
signal detected

detect_momentum · UR

● executed
direction
DOWN
current price
58.1%
anchor → trigger
62.2% → 58.1%
cusum @ trigger
-4.10
trigger hours
1h
duration
1h
72h range
58.1%—68.4% (Δ10.3pp)
tick density (6h)
0.50

Price fell 4.1pp from 62.2% to 58.1% over 1h (spike). Now at 58.1%. [Prior context: 24h ago: 63.5%, 72h range: 58.1%-68.4%]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 334 → 7 quality: HIGH tokens: 5539
AI verdict

Prompt-UR · continuation analysis

● executed
STALL conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: MEDIUM action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.2.0 · 13469 tokens
Days to resolution: 56 days. Theta-bleed is active (deadline <90 days, positive action required, trend DOWN), so in the absence of fresh progress, baseline drift favors NO; today’s move must be justified by concrete steps to persist. The ★DIRECT news predominantly supports YES: multiple outlets confirm the U.S. response to Iran’s proposal was transmitted via Pakistan, aligning with NO moving down. However, this is a widely confirmed process step from the prior day with no new venue/meeting announcement in the hour; Pakistan-facilitated crew transfers are supportive context but indirect, so momentum is not intensifying. After clustering: 1 distinct ★DIRECT event from 5 articles (EVIDENCE-tier: document transmitted via Pakistan); for a venue-specific market this does not, by itself, advance the resolution criterion; Momentum signals: trend=0, counter=0. With limited fresh catalysts and opposing theta-bleed, the 4pp intrahour dip is more likely to stall than extend; Remaining space: 58.1pp. Hard rules: No news–trend conflict; use of “not intensifying” invokes Rule 4 → STALL; no boundary constraints and no ≥4 counter-signals to force reversal.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
all
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ action_not_tradeable: STALL

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.