free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mom

Will Iran withdraw from the NPT before 2027?

will-iran-withdraw-from-the-npt-before-2027 · Will Iran withdraw from the NPT before 2027? · category: Geopolitics, Iran, Middle East, Nuclear, Politics · resolves
run_id: 15a75e18-8437-4df6-a2c9-2226802e6e49 · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
c1_boundary_discount_below_floor: raw=-3.0pp, after 0.7x discount=-2.1pp < 5pp floor (price=18.50% in deep boundary zone)
signal detected

detect_momentum · UR

● executed
direction
DOWN
current price
18.5%
anchor → trigger
21.5% → 18.5%
cusum @ trigger
-4.65
trigger hours
1h
duration
1h
72h range
18.5%—21.5% (Δ3.0pp)
tick density (6h)
0.50

Price fell 3.0pp from 21.5% to 18.5% over 1h (front_loaded). Now at 18.5%.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 367 → 93 quality: HIGH tokens: 34187
iran_npt_events noise
Gulf states in limbo as US-Iran crisis drags on
article_precursor relevant
ICE Midday: Canola Moves Up Despite Lack of Support
AI verdict

Prompt-UR · continuation analysis

● executed
CONTINUE conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: MEDIUM action: BUY NO
gpt-4.1 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.1.0 · 8764 tokens
Days to resolution: 250 days. Theta-bleed is negligible over this short window given the long time to resolution. Step 1a: The ★DIRECT news during this period is overwhelmingly focused on Iran’s foreign minister traveling to Pakistan for talks, with multiple sources confirming this diplomatic activity and US envoys also reportedly heading to Pakistan for discussions. The trend is DOWN (NO becoming more likely), and the news aligns: renewed diplomatic engagement and movement toward talks are clear de-escalation/process signals, which reduce the probability of Iran withdrawing from the NPT. News momentum is INTENSIFYING in the direction of diplomacy, with several outlets reporting on the same real-world event (the diplomatic trip and talks), but no escalation or withdrawal signals. After clustering, there is 1 distinct concrete de-escalation event (Iran’s FM traveling for talks, with US envoys also involved) from 7+ articles, and no escalation or withdrawal momentum. Momentum signals: trend=1 (de-escalation/process), counter=0. Remaining space: 13.5pp (from 18.5% to 5%). Step 3 hard rule check: No conflict, not mixed, not plateauing, not boundary zone, and the move is supported by a widely confirmed concrete process signal (not just rhetoric). The news supports the DOWN move continuing, but as this is a single process signal and the move is already front-loaded, conviction is MEDIUM and move is capped at 5pp per rules.
rule audit

audit_gate

✕ blocked
reasoning_audit:boundary_cap
Price 18.5% in boundary zone (≤20% or ≥80%). estimated_move capped: -5.0pp → -3pp per V6 Rule 7.
all
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ c1_boundary_discount_below_floor: raw=-3.0pp, after 0.7x discount=-2.1pp < 5pp floor (price=18.50% in deep boundary zone)

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.