free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mom

Kash Patel out by June 30?

kash-patel-out-by-june-30-165-798 · Kash Patel out by...? · category: Politics, Trump, Trump Cabinet · resolves
run_id: 1dd1511f-077b-4d41-8a75-014c6359e38c · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
reward_risk_too_low [SHORT_TERM (Relaxed R:R)]: R:R=0.45 < 0.5 (expected_move=5.0pp, stop_dist=11.2pp)
signal detected

detect_momentum · UR

● executed
direction
DOWN
current price
34.5%
anchor → trigger
62.5% → 34.5%
cusum @ trigger
-5.34
trigger hours
12h
duration
12h
72h range
34.5%—71.0% (Δ36.5pp)
tick density (6h)
0.83 · extreme vol

Price fell 28.0pp from 62.5% to 34.5% over 12h (steady). Now at 34.5%. [EVR: 72h range 36.5pp — extreme volatility regime]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 333 → 36 quality: HIGH tokens: 10765
article_antithesis neutral
Tim Walz and Kash Patel clash over Minnesota fraud search
article_thesis neutral
Why was Kash Patel not on alleged shooter's kill list?
article_thesis neutral
Kash Patel files a lulu of a lawsuit
article_antithesis neutral
Minnesota Fraudsters Get the FBI Treatment
article_thesis neutral
Robert Reich: Kash Patel Will Soon Be Out - OpEd
AI verdict

Prompt-UR · continuation analysis

● executed
CONTINUE conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: MEDIUM action: BUY NO
gpt-4.1 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.1.0 · 8731 tokens
Days to resolution: 61 days. Theta-bleed is active: the market requires a positive action (Patel out), the deadline is within 90 days, and the trend is DOWN (NO becoming more likely), so absence of news is bearish for YES. Step 1a: There are zero ★DIRECT events—no concrete evidence of Patel being ousted, resigning, or any formal process toward his removal. The trend is DOWN, implying NO is becoming more likely, and the news aligns: there is no direct evidence supporting a YES outcome. The CONTEXT news is mostly about scandals, rumors, and political clashes, but none constitute a formal process or action toward Patel's removal. The story is plateauing/fading: coverage is broad but repetitive, with no new concrete developments or escalation. Signal count: Momentum signals: trend=0, counter=0. Remaining space: 29.5pp (from 34.5% to 5%). Per hard rules: No news-trend conflict, not mixed, not a spike reversal, and theta-bleed supports continuation in the absence of direct signals. No boundary constraint applies. The move is justified by lack of positive action and time decay, not by a specific catalyst.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
all
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ reward_risk_too_low [SHORT_TERM (Relaxed R:R)]: R:R=0.45 < 0.5 (expected_move=5.0pp, stop_dist=11.2pp)

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.