free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mom

Will Choo Mi-ae win the 2026 Gyeonggi Province Gubernatorial Election?

will-choo-mi-ae-win-the-2026-gyeonggi-province-gubernatorial-election · 2026 Gyeonggi Province Gubernatorial Election Winner · category: Elections, Global Elections, Main Election, Politics, South Korea, World, World Elections · resolves
run_id: 1eab1fe5-b5a2-4142-8ce1-324a8f77d575 · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
action_not_tradeable: STALL
signal detected

detect_momentum · UR

● executed
direction
UP
current price
94.8%
anchor → trigger
91.8% → 94.8%
cusum @ trigger
3.81
trigger hours
1h
duration
1h
72h range
91.8%—94.8% (Δ3.0pp)
tick density (6h)
0.50

Price rose 3.0pp from 91.8% to 94.8% over 1h (steady). Now at 94.8%.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 168 → 11 quality: HIGH tokens: 17137
AI verdict

Prompt-UR · continuation analysis

● executed
STALL conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: MEDIUM action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.2.0 · 12305 tokens
Days to resolution: 29 days. Theta-bleed check: Not applicable (election market; deadline <90 days but trend is UP, not DOWN). The ★DIRECT news predominantly supports YES, and the trend is UP, so they ALIGN. Momentum is plateauing: two fresh district-level matchup polls show Choo Mi-ae leading by large margins, and both opposition candidates publicly ruled out unification (supportive context but rhetorical), with no credible counter-signals. After clustering: 2 distinct ★DIRECT polling events from 2 articles; the rest are mostly context about candidate lineup and unity chatter. Momentum signals: trend=2, counter=0. Continuation vs. reversal: support is real but localized (sub-provincial polling) and the price is already near the boundary, limiting follow-through without a province-wide poll or a formal opposition split confirmation. Remaining space: 5.2pp. Hard rule check: Rule 1 (conflict) not triggered; Rule 2 (balanced mixed) not applicable; Rule 3 (ASYMMETRIC MIXED) not used; Rule 4 trigger word (“plateauing”) applies → STALL; Rule 7 boundary caution supports STALL.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
all
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ action_not_tradeable: STALL

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.