← back to pipeline

Will JD Vance win the 2028 US Presidential Election? ↗

will-jd-vance-win-the-2028-us-presidential-election · Presidential Election Winner 2028 · category: Earn 4%, Elections, Global Elections, Main Election, Politics, President, US Election, United States, World Elections · resolves 2028-11-07

run_id: 4609719c-3060-46d5-b92e-d12fe138c4e4 · started 2026-04-28T12:43:45 · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected

no_trade: action=OMIT

signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed

direction

DOWN

current / peak

20.0% / 58.5%

move_start

18.7%

reversal

+38.4pp

move size / hours

39.8pp / 69.5h

shape

spike

72h range

18.1%—58.5% (Δ40.4pp)

since peak

1.0h

Price rose 39.8pp from 18.7% to 58.5% over 69.5h (spike), then reversed. Now at 20.0%, down 38.4pp from peak, 1.0h after the peak.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed

raw→filtered: 32 → 0 quality: MEDIUM tokens: 9757

retrieval recorded but no surviving headlines — the keyword nets didn't match any articles in the window.

AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed

OVERPRICED conviction: LOW opportunity: SMALL action: OMIT

gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 10721 tokens

Semantic Polarity: YES=JD Vance wins the 2028 US Presidential Election; NO=he does not. Trend is UP, pricing in the YES-World. Momentum check: E=0, D=0, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=0, D=0 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change.
Theta direction: NEUTRAL
Price move direction: UP (from 19% to 58%)
Alignment: N/A
Theta: NEUTRAL — no deadline
No Logical/Strong Divergence signals exist; instead, we have a >35pp spike with zero verified signals and a search failure banner, so any surge looks flow/rumor-driven rather than resolution-driven. There are no ★ DIRECT election-resolution events cited (no decisive endorsements, disqualifications, vote outcomes, or comparable settlement-adjacent triggers), so nothing in the feed advances the market toward “Vance actually winning.” A 40pp reprice typically requires resolution-level or multiple high-impact signals, which are absent here; thus the spike was not justified by the provided news and should revert.

rule audit

audit_gate

● executed

✓

ALL

trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped

✕ no_trade: action=OMIT

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.