free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

US-Iran nuclear deal by June 30?

us-iran-nuclear-deal-by-june-30 · US-Iran nuclear deal by June 30? · category: Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Israel, Middle East, Nuclear, Politics, World · resolves
run_id: 4ad171d0-05f6-4a99-8165-d0db6985018d · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
no_trade: action=OMIT
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
UP
current / peak
24.5% / 22.0%
move_start
29.6%
reversal
+2.5pp
move size / hours
7.6pp / 16.5h
shape
back_loaded
72h range
22.0%—32.5% (Δ10.5pp)
since peak
2.5h

Price fell 7.6pp from 29.6% to 22.0% over 16.5h (back_loaded), then reversed. Now at 24.5%, up 2.5pp from trough, 2.5h after the trough.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 335 → 5 quality: HIGH tokens: 5160
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
FAIR conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: None action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 14869 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = a signed US–Iran nuclear deal by June 30; NO = no deal signed by then. Trend is DOWN, pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=3, D=6, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Cessation D-collapse: raw D≈10 → collapsed D=6. Incremental only: E=0, D=2 (priced-in: E=3, D=4). Self-check: no change.
Theta direction: DOWN
Price move direction: DOWN (from 30% to 22%)
Alignment: SAME
Theta: DOWN — aligned
No Logical Divergence or Strong Divergence: incremental flow was net D (US/Gulf Arabs drafting a UN resolution condemning Iran over Hormuz; Israel approving major new fighter purchases) and offered no new pro-deal steps, while earlier pro-deal items (Iran’s proposal via Pakistan, mediator contacts) were already priced in. Critically, none of the fresh items are ★ DIRECT toward “deal signed” — they either escalate or harden positions and therefore fail to advance the settlement criteria. Given near-term time decay and fresh anti-deal signals, the 7.6pp drop is justified; the partial bounce looks like routine noise rather than a structural reversal.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ no_trade: action=OMIT

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.