free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mom

Insurrection Act invoked by December 31?

insurrection-act-invoked-by-december-31-184-556 · Insurrection Act invoked by...? · category: Minnesota Unrest, Politics, Trump · resolves
run_id: 644f961a-3762-418c-bc5f-9a3c3777b7b0 · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
action_not_tradeable: STALL
signal detected

detect_momentum · UR

● executed
direction
DOWN
current price
22.5%
anchor → trigger
24.5% → 22.5%
cusum @ trigger
-5.27
trigger hours
1h
duration
1h
72h range
21.5%—48.0% (Δ26.5pp)
tick density (6h)
0.50 · extreme vol

Price fell 2.0pp from 24.5% to 22.5% over 1h (front_loaded). Now at 22.5%. [Prior context: 24h ago: 24.5%, 72h range: 21.5%-48.0%] [EVR: 72h range 26.5pp — extreme volatility regime]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 25 → 3 quality: MEDIUM tokens: 14571
AI verdict

Prompt-UR · continuation analysis

● executed
STALL conviction: LOW opportunity: SMALL action: OMIT
gpt-4.1 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.1.0 · 6797 tokens
Days to resolution: 243 days. Theta-bleed is negligible at this horizon (>90 days), so time decay does not materially favor either side over a 2-3 day window. The trend is DOWN (NO becoming more likely), but there are zero ★DIRECT events—no concrete evidence of Insurrection Act invocation or process steps toward it. All three news items are CONTEXT: one discusses the President's low approval and possible election challenges (speculative, not action), another notes the event is "late 2026—far from now" (implying lack of immediacy), and the third is about a former defense minister being summoned over martial law charges (foreign, not US-specific, and not a direct precursor). The news flow is starved for resolution-relevant content, with no intensification or new actors—momentum is fading, not building. Momentum signals: trend=0, counter=0. Remaining space: 17.5pp. Per hard rules, with no ★DIRECT signals and only context/noise, and with the move being modest (2pp, not a spike), this is a classic plateauing scenario. RULE 4 ("plateauing," "not intensifying") binds: Action MUST be STALL.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
all
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ action_not_tradeable: STALL

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.