← back to pipeline
mom
Insurrection Act invoked by December 31? ↗
insurrection-act-invoked-by-december-31-184-556
· Insurrection Act invoked by...? · category: Minnesota Unrest, Politics, Trump
· resolves
run_id: 644f961a-3762-418c-bc5f-9a3c3777b7b0
· started
· status
skipped
· planner_skipped
· ✕ planner rejected
action_not_tradeable: STALL
signal detected
● executed
detect_momentum · UR
direction
DOWN
current price
22.5%
anchor → trigger
24.5% → 22.5%
cusum @ trigger
-5.27
trigger hours
1h
duration
1h
72h range
21.5%—48.0%
(Δ26.5pp)
tick density (6h)
0.50
· extreme vol
Price fell 2.0pp from 24.5% to 22.5% over 1h (front_loaded). Now at 22.5%. [Prior context: 24h ago: 24.5%, 72h range: 21.5%-48.0%] [EVR: 72h range 26.5pp — extreme volatility regime]
news gathered
● executed
news retrieval (tomographic)
raw→filtered: 25 → 3
quality: MEDIUM
tokens: 14571
gnews_thesis
relevant
Emergency Planning: The President Is Preparing to Challenge 2026 Midterms. The Country Can Still Act to Protect Them. - Washington Spectator
gnews_thesis
noise
Late 2026 — far from now - Independent Australia
gnews_mechanism
relevant
Exclusive: Ex-Defense Minister Summoned Over Martial Law Rebellion Charges - 조선일보
AI verdict
● executed
Prompt-UR · continuation analysis
STALL
conviction: LOW
opportunity: SMALL
action: OMIT
gpt-4.1 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.1.0 · 6797 tokens
Days to resolution: 243 days. Theta-bleed is negligible at this horizon (>90 days), so time decay does not materially favor either side over a 2-3 day window. The trend is DOWN (NO becoming more likely), but there are zero ★DIRECT events—no concrete evidence of Insurrection Act invocation or process steps toward it. All three news items are CONTEXT: one discusses the President's low approval and possible election challenges (speculative, not action), another notes the event is "late 2026—far from now" (implying lack of immediacy), and the third is about a former defense minister being summoned over martial law charges (foreign, not US-specific, and not a direct precursor). The news flow is starved for resolution-relevant content, with no intensification or new actors—momentum is fading, not building. Momentum signals: trend=0, counter=0. Remaining space: 17.5pp. Per hard rules, with no ★DIRECT signals and only context/noise, and with the move being modest (2pp, not a spike), this is a classic plateauing scenario. RULE 4 ("plateauing," "not intensifying") binds: Action MUST be STALL.
rule audit
● executed
audit_gate
✓
all
trade plan
○ skipped
position_planner
✕ action_not_tradeable: STALL
the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.