free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mom

Will Abelardo de la Espriella win the 2026 Colombian presidential election?

will-abelardo-de-la-espriella-win-the-2026-colombian-presidential-election · Colombia Presidential Election · category: Colombia, Colombia Election, Elections, Global Elections, Main Election, Politics, Rewards 200, 4.5, 50, World, World Elections · resolves
run_id: 653f43d6-caa4-435a-b065-b4a24b10add9 · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
action_not_tradeable: STALL
signal detected

detect_momentum · UR

● executed
direction
UP
current price
23.5%
anchor → trigger
20.5% → 23.5%
cusum @ trigger
3.84
trigger hours
1h
duration
1h
72h range
18.5%—27.0% (Δ8.5pp)
tick density (6h)
0.50

Price rose 3.0pp from 20.5% to 23.5% over 1h (front_loaded). Now at 23.5%.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 26 → 4 quality: HIGH tokens: 14835
AI verdict

Prompt-UR · continuation analysis

● executed
STALL conviction: LOW opportunity: SMALL action: OMIT
gpt-4.1 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.1.0 · 6953 tokens
Days to resolution: 60 days. Theta-bleed is not a major factor here (deadline > 90 days), so time decay does not strongly bias the market. Step 1a: There are zero ★DIRECT news events supporting either YES or NO; all four events are CONTEXT only. The trend is UP (YES more likely), but the news does not align—there is no direct evidence for Abelardo de la Espriella's candidacy gaining, nor any process signal (poll, endorsement, campaign event) relevant to his chances. The most relevant CONTEXT event is a plot against Iván Cepeda, a leading candidate, but this is not a direct signal for Abelardo and does not imply a shift in the race toward him. The other events (French support for Colombia, US tech policy, Colombia's regional alignment) are general context and not election-specific. News momentum is STARVED: no intensifying or even plateauing coverage about Abelardo, just unrelated or tangential developments. Momentum signals: trend=0, counter=0. Remaining space: 76.5pp. Per hard rules, with zero ★DIRECT signals and no process news, the move appears to be liquidity-driven or speculative, not information-driven. No rules are triggered that would allow CONTINUE or REVERSE; this is a classic STALL scenario.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
all
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ action_not_tradeable: STALL

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.