free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

US x Iran permanent peace deal by May 15, 2026?

us-x-iran-permanent-peace-deal-by-may-15-2026-144-885-839 · US x Iran permanent peace deal by...? · category: 10-point, Agreement, Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Politics, Trump, U.S. x Iran, ceasefire · resolves
run_id: 81931c64-3307-4cc5-9a84-73ac522f299a · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
no_trade: action=OMIT
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
DOWN
current / peak
19.1% / 22.6%
move_start
14.8%
reversal
+3.4pp
move size / hours
7.8pp / 20.0h
shape
spike
72h range
3.4%—22.6% (Δ19.2pp)
since peak
0.5h

Price rose 7.8pp from 14.8% to 22.6% over 20.0h (spike), then reversed. Now at 19.1%, down 3.4pp from peak, 0.5h after the peak. [Prior context: 24h ago: 14.2%, 72h range: 3.4%-22.6%]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 334 → 4 quality: HIGH tokens: 14970
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
FAIR conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: None action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.6 · 16186 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = a signed, permanent US–Iran peace deal by May 15, 2026; NO = no signed deal by then. Trend is UP, pricing in the YES-World. Momentum check: E=5, D=3, L=0 (R=0 unverified). 
Incremental only: E=5, D=3 (priced-in: E=0, D=0).
Self-check: no change.
Theta direction: DOWN
Price move direction: UP (from 15% to 23%)
Alignment: OPPOSITE
Theta: DOWN — opposed
No Logical Divergence: the price rose while net news momentum favored progress toward a deal. Notable process signals supportive of YES (but not fulfilling settlement): Reuters said Iran is reviewing a new US proposal and “closing in,” Pakistan touted a 24–72h breakthrough, Trump paused “Project Freedom,” and he set a one‑week response deadline; counter-signals included Iran denying a near deal and Trump saying it’s “too soon” to prep a signing, plus a tougher UNSC draft. None of these equals “permanent peace deal signed,” but the shift from mere status quo to framework/proposal/ultimatum plus a US operational pause is the ceasefire/deal exception that justifies a 5–15pp repricing. Given multiple fresh, resolution-adjacent process signals, the 7.8pp spike was broadly justified; the minor pullback is normal, not evidence of overreaction.

Kill switches:
- Iran or the US formally reject the current proposal or declare talks “collapsed”
- Trump announces “Project Freedom” has resumed due to lack of progress
- Iran’s Supreme National Security Council or MFA states there will be no deal before May 15
- UNSC passes a resolution authorizing force against Iran over Hormuz, triggering acute escalation
- Reuters/Axios retract the reported framework/proposal or senior officials on-record deny its existence
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ no_trade: action=OMIT

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.

step post-omit

news watch (A.2 / A.3)

● executed
watch: 151e720e
status: ⏳ expired
armed: 2026-05-07T12:23Z
closed: 2026-05-08T12:25Z
polls: 18
signals seen: 1882
decision price: 19.1pct