free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

US x Iran diplomatic meeting by May 31, 2026?

us-x-iran-diplomatic-meeting-by-may-31-2026 · US x Iran diplomatic meeting by...? · category: Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Politics, Trump, U.S. x Iran, Vance · resolves
run_id: 98d71836-0ba0-4c5d-861a-4493a52ce26f · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
no_trade: action=OMIT
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
UP
current / peak
43.5% / 36.5%
move_start
45.5%
reversal
+7.0pp
move size / hours
9.0pp / 10.5h
shape
steady
72h range
36.5%—49.5% (Δ13.0pp)
since peak
10.5h

Price fell 9.0pp from 45.5% to 36.5% over 10.5h (steady), then reversed. Now at 43.5%, up 7.0pp from trough, 10.5h after the trough.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 346 → 33 quality: HIGH tokens: 20439
article_precursor relevant
Iran bei der Fußball-WM: Was spricht dafür, was dagegen?
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
FAIR conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: None action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 14347 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = any verified scheduling/holding of a direct US–Iran diplomatic meeting; NO = continued stalemate/rejections/escalation with no meeting scheduled. Trend is DOWN, pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=2, D=2, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=2, D=2 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change. 
Theta direction: DOWN
Price move direction: DOWN (from 46% to 36%)
Alignment: SAME
Theta: DOWN — aligned
No Strong Divergence: signals were balanced; and there was no direct scheduling/confirmation of a US–Iran meeting. The most meeting-adjacent positives were Iran formally submitting a proposal via Pakistan and active Omani/Turkish mediation (E), but these are process-only; against that, Trump publicly signaled likely rejection and Iran issued hardline/ultimatum rhetoric (D), which are clear blockers. With a near-term deadline, a theta-aligned drop amplified by a fresh D8-style rejection is reasonable; absent any ★ DIRECT scheduling, the 9pp move was largely justified rather than an overreaction.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ no_trade: action=OMIT

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.