← back to pipeline
mr
Will the next diplomatic US-Iran meeting be in Pakistan? ↗
will-the-next-diplomatic-us-iran-meeting-be-in-pakistan-295
· Where will the next US-Iran diplomatic meeting happen? · category: Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Israel x Iran, Khamenei, Nuclear, Politics, Trump, U.S. x Iran, Vance, nuclear deal, rewards 100, 4.5, 100
· resolves
run_id: 9e8f7fc1-fd4e-48d8-91ef-4b90dc3a7374
· started
· status
skipped
· planner_skipped
· ✕ planner rejected
poor_real_rr: real_rr 0.65 < 1.2 for steady move (Risk=5.6pp vs Reward=3.6pp)
signal detected
● executed
detect_reversal
direction
DOWN
current / peak
67.6% / 70.0%
move_start
62.0%
reversal
+2.3pp
move size / hours
8.0pp / 24.5h
shape
steady
72h range
49.9%—70.8% (Δ20.9pp)
since peak
9.5h
Price rose 8.0pp from 62.0% to 70.0% over 24.5h (steady), then reversed. Now at 67.6%, down 2.3pp from peak, 9.5h after the peak. [Prior context: 24h ago: 65.8%, 72h range: 49.9%-70.8%]
news gathered
● executed
news retrieval (tomographic)
raw→filtered: 332 → 3
quality: HIGH
tokens: 4805
article_thesis
relevant
Iran demands US concessions, narrowing path to diplomatic talks
article_precursor
relevant
US talks trigger unprecedented rift in Iran's hardline camp
gnews_mechanism
relevant
Have US-Iran talks failed? Why no deal yet doesn’t mean diplomacy is dead - Al Jazeera
AI verdict
● executed
Prompt-MR · misprice analysis
OVERPRICED
conviction: MEDIUM
opportunity: SMALL
action: NO
override: OMIT_STRONG_ASSESSMENT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 15051 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = credible reporting that the next US–Iran diplomatic meeting is arranged/held in Pakistan; NO = talks stall, shift to other venues/mediators, or no meeting scheduled at all. Trend is UP, pricing in the YES-World. Momentum check: E=0, D=3, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=0, D=3 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change. Theta direction: NEUTRAL Price move direction: UP (from 62% to 70%) Alignment: N/A Theta: NEUTRAL — venue market (no theta) There is divergence: price rose while fresh signals were de-escalation-negative for meetings generally and provided zero DIRECT support for Pakistan as venue. Notable D signals opposing the rise: talks described as at an “impasse”/“second round yet to begin,” Iran demanding U.S. concessions (hardening preconditions), and the U.S. signaling a months-long extension of the naval blockade — all of which reduce near-term meeting odds and do not point to Pakistan. With no ★ DIRECT Pakistan/venue reporting, an 8pp climb on process/pressure-only news is not justified; a partial mean reversion is warranted.
rule audit
● executed
audit_gate
✓
ALL
trade plan
○ skipped
position_planner
✕ poor_real_rr: real_rr 0.65 < 1.2 for steady move (Risk=5.6pp vs Reward=3.6pp)
the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.