free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva win the 2026 Brazilian presidential election?

will-luiz-incio-lula-da-silva-win-the-2026-brazilian-presidential-election · Brazil Presidential Election · category: Brazil, Global Elections, Macro Election 2, Main Election, Politics, World, World Elections · resolves
run_id: a361727c-076c-4250-925e-32700ed69b2f · started · status skipped · audit_blocked · ✕ audit blocked
Theta Hard Rule (FAR-TERM): LLM stated 'f-check: no change. Theta direction: NEUTRAL Price move direction: DOWN (from 48% to 37%) Alignment:' but output UNDERPRICED instead of FAIR. Days to close: 154 (>60). Price trend: DOWN, opposing signals: 0 (need ≥3 to override FAIR).
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
UP
current / peak
39.5% / 37.0%
move_start
47.5%
reversal
+2.5pp
move size / hours
10.5pp / 0.5h
shape
steady
72h range
37.5%—39.5% (Δ2.0pp)
since peak
99.5h

Price fell 10.5pp from 47.5% to 37.0% over 0.5h (steady), then reversed. Now at 39.5%, up 2.5pp from trough, 99.5h after the trough.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 173 → 12 quality: HIGH tokens: 16330
gnews_thesis noise
Jair Bolsonaro - Britannica
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
UNDERPRICED conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: LARGE action: YES
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 16162 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = Lula wins in 2026; NO = any opponent wins. Trend is DOWN, pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=0, D=2, L=2 (R=0 unverified) — two distinct, verified institutional setbacks for Lula: Congress slashing Bolsonaro’s sentence/forcing early release (L1; bearish for Lula) and the Senate rejecting Lula’s STF nominee (L1; bearish). Incremental only: E=0, D=2 (priced-in: E=0, D=0); both D/L signals arrived after the plunge and cannot explain a 10.5pp, 0.5h drop on Apr 28. Self-check: no change.
Theta direction: NEUTRAL
Price move direction: DOWN (from 48% to 37%)
Alignment: N/A
Theta: NEUTRAL — no hard rule
No Strong Divergence exists; the later D momentum is broadly aligned with a lower price, but the timing mismatch means the immediate move was starved of DIRECT catalysts and looks flow/liquidity-driven. The cited ★ DIRECT events affect opponent viability but do not settle “who wins”; they are process/institutional shifts (L1) that could justify a modest repricing, not a sudden 10pp crash in minutes. Net: the sharp drop was largely unjustified by contemporaneous news and should mean-revert upward (as it already began to).
rule audit

audit_gate

✕ blocked
A_THETA_FAR_TERM
Theta Hard Rule (FAR-TERM): LLM stated 'f-check: no change. Theta direction: NEUTRAL Price move direction: DOWN (from 48% to 37%) Alignment:' but output UNDERPRICED instead of FAIR. Days to close: 154 (>60). Price trend: DOWN, opposing signals: 0 (need ≥3 to override FAIR).