free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mom

Will Russia capture all of Lyman by December 31, 2026?

will-russia-capture-all-of-lyman-by-december-31-2026 · Will Russia capture all of Lyman by...? · category: Geopolitics, Politics, Ukraine, Ukraine Map · resolves
run_id: a93e9b80-76c8-4fee-917a-f36c158b0484 · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
action_not_tradeable: STALL
signal detected

detect_momentum · UR

● executed
direction
UP
current price
39.5%
anchor → trigger
37.0% → 39.5%
cusum @ trigger
4.41
trigger hours
1h
duration
1h
72h range
37.0%—40.5% (Δ3.5pp)
tick density (6h)
0.50

Price rose 2.5pp from 37.0% to 39.5% over 1h (spike). Now at 39.5%.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 328 → 11 quality: HIGH tokens: 6274
AI verdict

Prompt-UR · continuation analysis

● executed
STALL conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: MEDIUM action: OMIT
gpt-4.1 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.1.0 · 7478 tokens
Days to resolution: 249 days. Theta-bleed is negligible over this short window, as the deadline is well beyond 90 days. The trend is UP (+2.5pp spike), implying YES (Russia capturing all of Lyman) is seen as more likely. The ★DIRECT news includes one relevant event: "Russian troops advance in Rodynske, Donetsk Oblast." However, Rodynske is not Lyman, and there is no direct confirmation of Russian forces capturing or entering Lyman itself—per the market-type module, only full capture or official confirmation of Lyman matters for escalation. The other ★DIRECT events are unrelated to the market resolution (Bosnia's EU path, Ukraine-Azerbaijan talks). After clustering, there is only 1 distinct, but indirect, momentum signal and 0 counter-signals. The news is thus weakly supportive of the trend, but not intensifying—there is no concrete action in Lyman, only general Russian advances in the broader oblast. The move is a small spike, not a surge, and there is no evidence of a resolution-class event or strong follow-through catalyst. Remaining space: 10.5pp (from 39.5% to 50%). Momentum signals: trend=1, counter=0. Step 3 hard rules: No news-trend conflict, not highly mixed, not a spike exhaustion, and no boundary or multi-threshold issues. The signal is too weak for CONTINUE, but not negative enough for REVERSE.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
all
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ action_not_tradeable: STALL

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.