← back to pipeline
mr
Will Steve Witkoff attend the next US x Iran diplomatic meeting? ↗
will-steve-witkoff-attend-the-next-us-x-iran-diplomatic-meeting
· Who will attend the next US x Iran diplomatic meeting? · category: Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Kushner, Politics, Trump, U.S. x Iran, Vance, Witkoff, rubio
· resolves
run_id: ae523a41-2adc-4ec5-8a79-0e5823f14e48
· started
· status
skipped
· planner_skipped
· ✕ planner rejected
no_trade: action=OMIT
signal detected
● executed
detect_reversal
direction
UP
current / peak
60.9% / 58.5%
move_start
72.4%
reversal
+2.3pp
move size / hours
13.9pp / 54.5h
shape
steady
72h range
58.5%—72.8% (Δ14.3pp)
since peak
2.5h
Price fell 13.9pp from 72.4% to 58.5% over 54.5h (steady), then reversed. Now at 60.9%, up 2.3pp from trough, 2.5h after the trough.
news gathered
● executed
news retrieval (tomographic)
raw→filtered: 39 → 0
quality: HIGH
tokens: 9803
retrieval recorded but no surviving headlines — the keyword nets didn't match any articles in the window.
AI verdict
● executed
Prompt-MR · misprice analysis
FAIR
conviction: LOW
opportunity: None
action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.7 · 12243 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = Steve Witkoff is confirmed/invited and attends the next US–Iran diplomatic meeting; NO = the next such meeting occurs without him, is canceled/postponed past the deadline, or he is ruled out. Trend is DOWN, pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=0, D=0, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=0, D=0 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change. Theta direction: DOWN Price move direction: DOWN (from 72% to 58%) Alignment: SAME Theta: DOWN — aligned No Logical Divergence exists; with zero signals and a near-term deadline, a steady 54.5h drift down is consistent with time-decay rather than fresh information. There are no ★ DIRECT events (e.g., an official attendee list naming Witkoff, or an on-record denial) to advance or block resolution; the CIRCUIT BREAKER — SEARCH FAILURE means we cannot cite news catalysts. Given theta alignment and lack of verified incremental signals, the 13.9pp drop is plausibly time-decay repricing rather than overreaction, so reversion isn’t compelled by the (absent) news.
rule audit
● executed
audit_gate
✓
ALL
trade plan
○ skipped
position_planner
✕ no_trade: action=OMIT
the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.
step post-omit
● executed
news watch (A.2 / A.3)
watch: fc3334b3
status:
⏳ expired
armed: 2026-05-12T06:44Z
closed: 2026-05-13T07:12Z
polls: 8
signals seen: 3922
decision price: 60.9pct