free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mom

Will Alberta vote for independence in 2026?

will-alberta-vote-for-independence-in-2026 · Will Alberta vote for independence in 2026? · category: Canada, Politics, Trump, World · resolves
run_id: b1ad2fbe-780b-4c69-8a7a-e030d3731264 · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
action_not_tradeable: REVERSE
signal detected

detect_momentum · UR

● executed
direction
DOWN
current price
11.0%
anchor → trigger
14.2% → 11.0%
cusum @ trigger
-3.96
trigger hours
1h
duration
1h
72h range
11.0%—14.2% (Δ3.2pp)
tick density (6h)
0.50

Price fell 3.2pp from 14.2% to 11.0% over 1h (steady). Now at 11.0%.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 333 → 24 quality: HIGH tokens: 18347
AI verdict

Prompt-UR · continuation analysis

● executed
REVERSE conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: MEDIUM action: BUY YES
gpt-5 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.4.0 · 15212 tokens
Days to resolution: 231 days. YES resolves if Alberta holds an official province-wide independence referendum in 2026; NO resolves if no such vote occurs by Dec 31, including attempts that are proposed or petitioned but blocked (a near-miss). Theta-bleed is negligible here (deadline >90 days, not a win/lose election-result market). Among ★DIRECT items, there is one concrete ACTION-tier event supporting NO: an Alberta court struck down/blocked the independence petition/approval as “unreasonable” (multiple outlets reporting the same ruling); the premier calling the ruling “anti-democratic” is RHETORIC (0), and May 11 items about filing the petition/“hopes” for an October vote are EVIDENCE-tier via NEAR-MISS and STALE. The ★DIRECT news thus predominantly supports NO, while the trend is DOWN (NO becoming less likely) — this is a CONFLICT. Coverage is fresh and widely confirmed, indicating a decisive setback to scheduling any 2026 vote. Fresh vs stale: trend_fresh=0, trend_stale=1 (petition filed/hope pieces), counter_fresh=1, counter_stale=0; Momentum signals: trend=0, counter=1. Remaining space: 11pp; with price already near the lower boundary for NO, further downside would need strong pro-YES catalysts (absent), so a reversion is more likely; per Rule 1 (news–trend conflict with a concrete ACTION), REVERSE is favored over STALL.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
all
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ action_not_tradeable: REVERSE

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.

step post-omit

news watch (A.2 / A.3)

● executed
watch: a3a27a9c
status: ⚡ armed
armed: 2026-05-14T00:04Z
polls: 4
signals seen: 3459
decision price: 11.0pct