← back to pipeline

Will Ed Gallrein be the Republican nominee for KY-04? ↗

will-ed-gallrein-be-the-republican-nominee-for-ky-04 · KY-04 Republican Primary Winner · category: Elections, House Primary, Kentucky Primary, Politics, Primaries, Republican Primary, primary elections · resolves 2026-05-19

run_id: b7212879-41fd-49cd-9cd5-3e9a95e66fec · started 2026-05-01T15:46:57 · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected

low_liquidity_efficiency: spread=1.2pp is > 50% of expected net profit (even at f=1.0)

signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed

direction

current / peak

25.1% / 21.4%

move_start

27.7%

reversal

+3.7pp

move size / hours

6.3pp / 16.0h

shape

spike

72h range

21.4%—30.8% (Δ9.4pp)

since peak

1.0h

Price fell 6.3pp from 27.7% to 21.4% over 16.0h (spike), then reversed. Now at 25.1%, up 3.7pp from trough, 1.0h after the trough.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed

raw→filtered: 33 → 2 quality: HIGH tokens: 14529

2026-05-01 gnews_mechanism relevant

Kentucky Fourth Congressional District 2026: Latest Polls - The New York Times

2026-04-30 gnews_thesis relevant

Massie leads challenger Gallrein in GOP primary - irontontribune.com

AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed

UNDERPRICED conviction: HIGH opportunity: SMALL action: YES

gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 11766 tokens

Semantic Polarity: YES=Ed Gallrein wins the KY-04 GOP nomination; NO=he does not. Trend is DOWN, pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=0, D=0, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=0, D=0 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change. 
Theta direction: NEUTRAL
Price move direction: DOWN (from 28% to 21%)
Alignment: N/A
Theta: NEUTRAL — no deadline
Logical Divergence: Yes — price fell despite no new DIRECT or verified bearish signals during the move window. The only items are CONTEXT: an April 30 local piece noting “Massie leads” (pre-move, thus priced-in) and a May 1 NYT polling page without new on-record figures; no DIRECT developments (e.g., withdrawals, disqualifications, or an endorsed, named new poll result) are reported in the provided feed. With zero incremental E/D signals and a >5pp drop over 16h, this looks flow-driven rather than fundamentally updated; the move is unjustified and should revert upward (which has already started).

rule audit

audit_gate

● executed

✓

ALL

trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped

✕ low_liquidity_efficiency: spread=1.2pp is > 50% of expected net profit (even at f=1.0)

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.