free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will no qualifying diplomatic US-Iran meeting occur by June 30, 2026?

will-no-qualifying-diplomatic-us-iran-meeting-occur-by-june-30-2026-673 · Where will the next US-Iran diplomatic meeting happen? · category: Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Israel x Iran, Khamenei, Nuclear, Politics, Trump, U.S. x Iran, Vance, nuclear deal, rewards 100, 4.5, 100 · resolves
run_id: d65c5047-455b-472d-ba00-281c0c48c319 · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
low_liquidity_efficiency: spread=1.6pp is > 50% of expected net profit (even at f=1.0)
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
UP
current / peak
23.0% / 16.4%
move_start
38.9%
reversal
+6.6pp
move size / hours
22.5pp / 20.5h
shape
spike
72h range
16.4%—42.4% (Δ26.0pp)
since peak
1.5h

Price fell 22.5pp from 38.9% to 16.4% over 20.5h (spike), then reversed. Now at 23.0%, up 6.6pp from trough, 1.5h after the trough.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 350 → 89 quality: HIGH tokens: 24058
article_thesis noise
Iran conflict update from Wajeeh Lion
article_thesis noise
Oil price plunges after new US-Iran deal report
article_thesis noise
What about Iran's plutonium? - UPI.com
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
UNDERPRICED conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: LARGE action: YES
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 17411 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = no qualifying US–Iran diplomatic meeting by Jun 30, 2026; NO = at least one qualifying meeting occurs. Trend is DOWN, pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=3, D=5, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=3, D=5 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change.
Theta direction: UP
Price move direction: DOWN (from 39% to 16%)
Alignment: OPPOSITE
Theta: UP — opposed
No Strong Divergence (price fell and D slightly dominates), but the dominant signals are process-only de-escalation (draft “one-page memo” under review D7, mediator optimism D5, US pause of operations D4, Hormuz passage assurance D6) that do not themselves confirm or schedule a qualifying US–Iran diplomatic meeting; meanwhile, Trump saying it’s “too early” for a peace deal and Iran dismissing proposals (E) are direct headwinds to a meeting. With no headline confirming or scheduling a bilateral US–Iran diplomatic meeting, a 22.5pp collapse on process news looks oversized (calibration: several medium-impact process signals usually justify ~5–10pp), so the move likely overreacted and should partially revert.

Kill switches:
- White House and Iran’s MFA jointly announce a scheduled bilateral meeting (date/location) before June 30, 2026
- Reuters/AP reports US Secretary of State holds a face-to-face meeting with Iran’s Foreign Minister (photo/communiqué)
- Pakistan (or another mediator) confirms a direct US–Iran ministerial in Islamabad/Beijing within days
- Official readouts from both sides state a direct bilateral session occurred (even on the margins of a multilateral) before the deadline
- US and Iran issue a joint communiqué after direct talks confirming continued bilateral meetings before June 30, 2026
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ low_liquidity_efficiency: spread=1.6pp is > 50% of expected net profit (even at f=1.0)

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.

step post-omit

news watch (A.2 / A.3)

● executed
watch: a3494830
status: ⏳ expired
armed: 2026-05-07T08:51Z
closed: 2026-05-08T08:58Z
polls: 17
signals seen: 0
decision price: 23.0pct