free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Starmer out by December 31, 2026?

starmer-out-by-december-31-2026-936-416-977-234-134-475 · Starmer out by...? · category: Grooming Gangs, Politics, Starmer, UK, World, keir · resolves
run_id: e4d2bd9c-5e4d-40be-8468-4e253721e702 · started · status skipped · audit_blocked · ✕ audit blocked
move_start (52.5%) is near 72h low and was reached by a 15.0pp spike from 24h-ago price (67.5%). This is a bubble bottom, not a stable equilibrium. Mean-reverting to this level is structurally unsound.
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
DOWN
current / peak
60.5% / 62.5%
move_start
52.5%
reversal
+2.0pp
move size / hours
10.0pp / 4.0h
shape
steady
72h range
52.5%—71.5% (Δ19.0pp)
since peak
2.0h

Price rose 10.0pp from 52.5% to 62.5% over 4.0h (steady), then reversed. Now at 60.5%, down 2.0pp from peak, 2.0h after the peak. [Prior context: 24h ago: 67.5%, 72h range: 52.5%-71.5%]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 347 → 36 quality: HIGH tokens: 11001
article_thesis relevant
Is it time to start feeling sorry for Keir Starmer?
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
OVERPRICED conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: LARGE action: NO
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v9.0_theta_v3 · 15226 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES=Starmer is out of office by 2026-12-31; NO=Starmer remains PM through that date. Trend is UP, pricing in YES-World. Momentum check: E=2, D=2, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=2, D=2 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change.
Theta direction: DOWN
Price move direction: UP (from 52% to 62%)
Alignment: OPPOSITE
Theta: DOWN — opposed
No Strong Divergence: signals are mixed, and key D signals (Starmer explicitly refusing to resign; Deputy PM Lammy publicly backing him) run against the UP move, while E signals are limited to calls from one MP and a former minister—pressure but not mechanisms. There are no ★ DIRECT resolution steps (no no-confidence vote scheduled, no leadership challenge formally launched, no resignation), so a 10pp repricing on process/pressure alone is likely an overshoot. The move was not justified by concrete steps toward removal and should mean-revert lower.
rule audit

audit_gate

✕ blocked
C_BUBBLE_24H_SPIKE
move_start (52.5%) is near 72h low and was reached by a 15.0pp spike from 24h-ago price (67.5%). This is a bubble bottom, not a stable equilibrium. Mean-reverting to this level is structurally unsound.
step post-omit

news watch (A.2 / A.3)

● executed
watch: 6f2ea163
status: ↻ reeval_fired (flipped_to_trade)
armed: 2026-05-08T15:01Z
closed: 2026-05-09T05:35Z
polls: 5
signals seen: 1983
decision price: 60.5pct