free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mom

Will anyone be charged over Epstein disclosures?

will-anyone-be-charged-over-epstein-disclosures · Will anyone be charged over Epstein disclosures? · category: Courts, Epstein, Politics, Trump, epstein files, files · resolves
run_id: eb8d587d-482f-4b2b-9208-3a3e98aa55e5 · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
reward_risk_too_low [LONG_TERM (Strict R:R)]: R:R=0.58 < 0.8 (expected_move=3.5pp, stop_dist=6.0pp)
signal detected

detect_momentum · UR

● executed
direction
UP
current price
26.5%
anchor → trigger
24.0% → 26.5%
cusum @ trigger
4.01
trigger hours
1h
duration
1h
72h range
24.5%—26.5% (Δ2.0pp)
tick density (6h)
0.50

Price rose 2.5pp from 24.0% to 26.5% over 1h (spike). Now at 26.5%.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 335 → 20 quality: HIGH tokens: 17780
AI verdict

Prompt-UR · continuation analysis

● executed
CONTINUE conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: MEDIUM action: BUY YES
gpt-4.1 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.1.0 · 8137 tokens
Days to resolution: 249 days. Theta-bleed is negligible over this short window, as the deadline is >90 days away. The trend is UP (+2.5pp spike), implying YES is becoming more likely. The ★DIRECT news during this period includes: (1) a federal judge issuing penalties against a legal team in an Epstein-linked case involving Leon Black, and (2) the US DOJ blocking UK access to unredacted Epstein files, requiring a formal request for further investigation. After clustering, these represent two distinct real-world developments: one is a concrete legal action (penalties in an Epstein-linked case), and the other is a process step (DOJ's stance on file sharing). Both are process/procedural, not final charges, but the judge's action is a tangible escalation in legal scrutiny around Epstein-linked actors. The DOJ's bureaucratic delay is a resistance signal, as it slows investigative momentum. The story is not intensifying—there is no new indictment or charge, but there is a fresh, concrete legal action (penalty) and ongoing procedural friction. Momentum signals: trend=1 (judge's penalty), counter=1 (DOJ blocking files). Remaining space: 23.5pp (to 50%). The move is a small spike, and the news is ASYMMETRIC MIXED: the judge's penalty is a higher-quality, concrete action than the DOJ's bureaucratic delay, but neither is a direct charge. Step 3: Rule 3 (ASYMMETRIC MIXED) applies—CONTINUE is allowed, but conviction must be ≤ MEDIUM and move ≤ 5pp. No other hard rules bind.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
all
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ reward_risk_too_low [LONG_TERM (Strict R:R)]: R:R=0.58 < 0.8 (expected_move=3.5pp, stop_dist=6.0pp)

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.