free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mom

Will Steve Hilton win the California Governor Election in 2026?

will-steve-hilton-win-the-california-governor-election-in-2026 · California Governor Election Winner · category: California Midterm, Elections, Governor midterms, Politics, Rewards 300 4.5 50, US Election · resolves
run_id: f22fcdb4-7d96-414c-a26c-6abca98ed555 · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
action_not_tradeable: STALL
signal detected

detect_momentum · UR

● executed
direction
DOWN
current price
5.0%
anchor → trigger
8.8% → 5.0%
cusum @ trigger
-6.25
trigger hours
1h
duration
1h
72h range
5.0%—12.0% (Δ7.0pp)
tick density (6h)
0.83

Price fell 3.8pp from 8.8% to 5.0% over 1h (spike). Now at 5.0%.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 218 → 54 quality: HIGH tokens: 22968
article_thesis neutral
5 Takeaways From the California Gubernatorial Debate
AI verdict

Prompt-UR · continuation analysis

● executed
STALL conviction: LOW opportunity: SMALL action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.2.0 · 12866 tokens
Days to resolution: 180 days. Theta-bleed check: Not active (deadline > 90 days), so time decay does not favor NO over the next few days. The ★DIRECT news predominantly supports MIXED (there are no direct, resolution-touching items), but qualitatively ASYMMETRIC MIXED toward YES because the only concrete datapoint in the feed is a Newsweek-cited SurveyUSA poll showing Steve Hilton getting a post-debate boost (primary), while opposing items are mostly opinion/attacks. Momentum looks debate-driven and now plateauing around commentary rather than new data; the spike appears to have been catalyzed by the poll mention plus a GOP rival’s gaffe, with no fresh quant signals since. Given zero ★DIRECT signals and proximity to the 0% boundary, follow-through is limited absent another credible statewide general-election poll or structural shift. Momentum signals: trend=0, counter=0. Remaining space: 5.0pp. Hard rule check: No NEWS-TREND conflict; ASYMMETRIC MIXED present but Rule 4 (plateauing) and boundary awareness constrain to STALL; Rule 7 (theta+boundary) not applicable; no multi-threshold or conflict-ending rules triggered.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
all
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ action_not_tradeable: STALL

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.

step post-omit

news watch (A.2 / A.3)

● executed
watch: 6008d83a
status: ⏳ expired
armed: 2026-05-07T08:51Z
closed: 2026-05-08T08:58Z
polls: 17
signals seen: 0
decision price: 5.0pct