free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mom

Will Paloma Valencia win the 2026 Colombian presidential election?

will-paloma-valencia-win-the-2026-colombian-presidential-election · Colombia Presidential Election · category: Colombia, Colombia Election, Elections, Global Elections, Main Election, Politics, Rewards 200, 4.5, 50, World, World Elections · resolves
run_id: f27a4162-ce83-476e-affa-359d490a566e · started · status skipped · audit_blocked · ✕ audit blocked
Reasoning contains 1 VERIFY trigger(s) across 1 category(ies): mixed_news. Action overridden: CONTINUE → STALL.
signal detected

detect_momentum · UR

● executed
direction
DOWN
current price
38.4%
anchor → trigger
44.1% → 38.4%
cusum @ trigger
-4.38
trigger hours
8h
duration
8h
72h range
38.2%—44.6% (Δ6.4pp)
tick density (6h)
0.50

Price fell 5.7pp from 44.1% to 38.4% over 8h (steady). Now at 38.4%.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 284 → 65 quality: HIGH tokens: 29918
AI verdict

Prompt-UR · continuation analysis

● executed
CONTINUE conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: MEDIUM action: BUY NO
gpt-4.1 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.1.0 · 9247 tokens
Days to resolution: 60 days. Theta-bleed is active (deadline <90 days, trend DOWN, positive action required for YES), so in the absence of positive news for Paloma Valencia, the price should drift downward. Step 1a: The ★DIRECT news is the Partido Liberal's pending decision on whether to support Paloma Valencia in the first round—a potential major coalition development, but as of this window, it is only a scheduled meeting, not a confirmed endorsement. The trend is DOWN (NO more likely), and the news aligns: there is no confirmation of new support for Valencia, and the rest of the news is dominated by debate maneuvering, candidate positioning, and campaign disputes—none of which are concrete process signals for a Paloma surge. News momentum is plateauing: the story is focused on debates and campaign friction, not on new alliances or polling breakthroughs. After clustering, there is 1 distinct ★DIRECT event (Liberal Party decision pending, not yet actioned). Momentum signals: trend=1 (pending Liberal decision, but not yet a pro-Valencia move), counter=0 (no concrete positive for Valencia). Remaining space: 38.4pp (ample room for further move). Step 3 hard rule check: No news-trend conflict, not highly mixed, not a spike exhaustion, not at boundary, and theta-bleed supports continuation in the absence of positive action. The only ★DIRECT event is a process step, not a completed alliance, so the move is justified but not high conviction.
rule audit

audit_gate

✕ blocked
reasoning_audit:STALL
Reasoning contains 1 VERIFY trigger(s) across 1 category(ies): mixed_news. Action overridden: CONTINUE → STALL.