← back to pipeline
mom
Will Paloma Valencia win the 2026 Colombian presidential election? ↗
will-paloma-valencia-win-the-2026-colombian-presidential-election
· Colombia Presidential Election · category: Colombia, Colombia Election, Elections, Global Elections, Main Election, Politics, Rewards 200, 4.5, 50, World, World Elections
· resolves
run_id: f27a4162-ce83-476e-affa-359d490a566e
· started
· status
skipped
· audit_blocked
· ✕ audit blocked
Reasoning contains 1 VERIFY trigger(s) across 1 category(ies): mixed_news. Action overridden: CONTINUE → STALL.
signal detected
● executed
detect_momentum · UR
direction
DOWN
current price
38.4%
anchor → trigger
44.1% → 38.4%
cusum @ trigger
-4.38
trigger hours
8h
duration
8h
72h range
38.2%—44.6%
(Δ6.4pp)
tick density (6h)
0.50
Price fell 5.7pp from 44.1% to 38.4% over 8h (steady). Now at 38.4%.
news gathered
● executed
news retrieval (tomographic)
raw→filtered: 284 → 65
quality: HIGH
tokens: 29918
article_thesis
noise
Paloma Valencia propone debate de todos los presidenciables en el Congreso | El Nuevo Siglo
article_thesis
noise
Defensoría del Pueblo negó supuesto informe que mencionó Valencia sobre apoyo armado a Cepeda
article_thesis
noise
El debate por los debates: la pelea entre la derecha, la izquierda y el centro
article_thesis
noise
De la Espriella desarmó propuesta de Paloma Valencia sobre debate en el Congreso: "No es correcto"
article_thesis
noise
Oviedo revela que le propusieron aspirar a la Alcaldía de Bogotá en lugar de unirse a campaña de Paloma Valencia
article_thesis
noise
"Una farsa": Fajardo arremete contra Cepeda por condiciones en debate que lo deja por fuera
article_thesis
noise
Angélica Lozano a Iván Cepeda: "Hasta el abogado de la mafia debate con el que le pongan
article_thesis
noise
El ultimátum de Paloma Valencia a Iván Cepeda: esto pasará si no asiste al debate presidencial en el Congreso
article_thesis
noise
Iván Cepeda y Paloma Valencia protagonizan tenso debate político: "No le dé miedo debatir"
article_thesis
noise
Sergio Fajardo pide a los medios hacer un debate sin censura: "estoy listo, yo no pongo condiciones
article_thesis
noise
Defensora colombiana advierte que las violencias digitales deterioran debate electoral
article_thesis
noise
Choque entre Paloma Valencia e Iván Cepeda por propuesta para hacer debate presidencial en Congreso
article_thesis
noise
"Si el debate avanza con exclusiones será una farsa": Sergio Fajardo arremete contra las condiciones de Cepeda
article_thesis
noise
Si Cepeda no va a la montaña, la montaña lleva el debate a Cepeda
AI verdict
● executed
Prompt-UR · continuation analysis
CONTINUE
conviction: MEDIUM
opportunity: MEDIUM
action: BUY NO
gpt-4.1 · prompt_2_trend_ur_v6.1.0 · 9247 tokens
Days to resolution: 60 days. Theta-bleed is active (deadline <90 days, trend DOWN, positive action required for YES), so in the absence of positive news for Paloma Valencia, the price should drift downward. Step 1a: The ★DIRECT news is the Partido Liberal's pending decision on whether to support Paloma Valencia in the first round—a potential major coalition development, but as of this window, it is only a scheduled meeting, not a confirmed endorsement. The trend is DOWN (NO more likely), and the news aligns: there is no confirmation of new support for Valencia, and the rest of the news is dominated by debate maneuvering, candidate positioning, and campaign disputes—none of which are concrete process signals for a Paloma surge. News momentum is plateauing: the story is focused on debates and campaign friction, not on new alliances or polling breakthroughs. After clustering, there is 1 distinct ★DIRECT event (Liberal Party decision pending, not yet actioned). Momentum signals: trend=1 (pending Liberal decision, but not yet a pro-Valencia move), counter=0 (no concrete positive for Valencia). Remaining space: 38.4pp (ample room for further move). Step 3 hard rule check: No news-trend conflict, not highly mixed, not a spike exhaustion, not at boundary, and theta-bleed supports continuation in the absence of positive action. The only ★DIRECT event is a process step, not a completed alliance, so the move is justified but not high conviction.
rule audit
✕ blocked
audit_gate
✕
reasoning_audit:STALL
Reasoning contains 1 VERIFY trigger(s) across 1 category(ies): mixed_news. Action overridden: CONTINUE → STALL.