free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

US x Iran diplomatic meeting by May 15, 2026?

us-x-iran-diplomatic-meeting-by-may-15-2026 · US x Iran diplomatic meeting by...? · category: Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Politics, Trump, U.S. x Iran, Vance · resolves
run_id: f4813000-96c6-41ec-b762-a9fb6962972d · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
no_trade: action=OMIT
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
DOWN
current / peak
21.5% / 23.5%
move_start
17.4%
reversal
+2.0pp
move size / hours
6.1pp / 20.5h
shape
spike
72h range
16.5%—36.5% (Δ20.0pp)
since peak
2.5h

Price rose 6.1pp from 17.4% to 23.5% over 20.5h (spike), then reversed. Now at 21.5%, down 2.0pp from peak, 2.5h after the peak. [Prior context: 24h ago: 17.0%, 72h range: 16.5%-36.5%]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 340 → 7 quality: HIGH tokens: 5571
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
FAIR conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: None action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 15444 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = a US–Iran diplomatic meeting is confirmed/held by May 15, 2026; NO = no such meeting occurs. Trend is UP, pricing in the YES-World. Momentum check: E=2, D=2, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=2, D=2 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change. 
Theta direction: DOWN
Price move direction: UP (from 17% to 24%)
Alignment: OPPOSITE
Theta: DOWN — opposed
There is no Logical or Strong Divergence; the most recent headlines lean E: Trump stating “very positive” US–Iran discussions are ongoing and Iran transmitting a formal multi-point proposal via Pakistan both increase meeting odds, while Trump’s public rejection/“hasn’t paid a big enough price” posture and Iran’s ultimatum rhetoric are D-blockers. None of the items constitute a scheduled/confirmed bilateral meeting, but multiple process-level E signals plausibly justify a 5–10pp repricing, matching the 6.1pp move. Overall, the spike looks news-supported rather than an overreaction, so mean reversion is not indicated on news grounds.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ no_trade: action=OMIT

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.