free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will Paloma Valencia win the 2026 Colombian presidential election?

will-paloma-valencia-win-the-2026-colombian-presidential-election · Colombia Presidential Election · category: Colombia, Colombia Election, Elections, Global Elections, Main Election, Politics, Rewards 200, 4.5, 50, World, World Elections · resolves
run_id: f4d27e92-7d12-4b3e-b212-8a3828ca6d2d · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
no_trade: action=OMIT
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
UP
current / peak
27.2% / 25.1%
move_start
33.7%
reversal
+2.1pp
move size / hours
8.6pp / 80.5h
shape
spike
72h range
25.1%—33.6% (Δ8.5pp)
since peak
3.5h

Price fell 8.6pp from 33.7% to 25.1% over 80.5h (spike), then reversed. Now at 27.2%, up 2.1pp from trough, 3.5h after the trough.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 223 → 31 quality: HIGH tokens: 5225
article_thesis relevant
Elección con dos perfiles
article_thesis relevant
Elecciones presidenciales en Colombia - La Tercera
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
FAIR conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: None action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 14669 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES=Paloma Valencia wins the presidential election; NO=any other candidate wins. Trend is DOWN, pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=0, D=2, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=0, D=2 (priced-in: E=0, D=1). Self-check: no change. Theta direction: NEUTRAL
Price move direction: DOWN (from 34% to 25%)
Alignment: N/A
Theta: NEUTRAL — election market. No Logical Divergence: the drop aligns with D momentum (negative for Paloma). ★ DIRECT-type election indicators here are polling: the CAMBIO–CNC polling wave (priced-in) and the 5/4 Ponderador de encuestas update plus EFE/La Tercera syntheses indicating the race centering on Cepeda vs. De la Espriella (incremental D) all reduce Paloma’s path to victory and do not violate settlement criteria for “win.” Given multiple fresh, corroborative polling/process signals and no countervailing E signals, an 8.6pp repricing sits within the 5–10pp band consistent with such developments, so the move was justified rather than an overreaction.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ no_trade: action=OMIT

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.