free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will Donald Trump visit China on May 13, 2026?

will-donald-trump-visit-china-on-may-13-2026 · Will Trump visit China on...? · category: China, Geopolitics, Politics, Tariffs, Trade War, Trump, Trump-Xi, Trump-Xi Summit, rewards 100, 4.5, 100 · resolves
run_id: f9e17b9a-eb46-4882-a3c5-6bad4fc6008a · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
no_trade: action=OMIT
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
DOWN
current / peak
77.5% / 81.5%
move_start
66.5%
reversal
+4.0pp
move size / hours
15.0pp / 5.5h
shape
steady
72h range
43.0%—83.0% (Δ40.0pp)
since peak
0.5h

Price rose 15.0pp from 66.5% to 81.5% over 5.5h (steady), then reversed. Now at 77.5%, down 4.0pp from peak, 0.5h after the peak. [Prior context: 24h ago: 51.5%, 72h range: 43.0%-83.0%]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 355 → 29 quality: HIGH tokens: 19344
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
FAIR conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: None action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v9.0_theta_v3 · 17337 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = Trump is physically in China on May 13, 2026; NO = he is not in China that day (arrives later/earlier or cancels). Trend is UP, pricing in YES-World.
Momentum check: E=0, D=3, L=0 (R=0 unverified).
Incremental only: E=0, D=2 (priced-in: E=0, D=1).
Self-check: no change.
Theta direction: DOWN
Price move direction: UP (from 66% to 82%)
Alignment: OPPOSITE
Theta: DOWN — opposed
No Strong Divergence: opposing (D) incremental signals = 2 (<3), so under the Extreme Volatility default the move stands. No ★ DIRECT confirmations of a May 13 presence were provided; instead, the clearest date-specific items point to a May 14–15 summit (CSIS, priced-in) and China–US preparatory talks in Seoul on “Wednesday” ahead of the summit (likely May 13), which would make a May 13 China presence less likely but do not meet the ≥3 contradicting-signal bar. Therefore the 15pp rise appears driven by broad confirmation/anticipation of the China trip rather than new date-specific evidence, and with insufficient opposing incremental signals in this high-volatility regime, the move is FAIR rather than an overreaction likely to revert.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ no_trade: action=OMIT

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.

step post-omit

news watch (A.2 / A.3)

● executed
watch: 95ef90e6
status: ⏳ expired
armed: 2026-05-10T21:45Z
closed: 2026-05-11T22:44Z
polls: 10
signals seen: 3459
decision price: 77.5pct