free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will Russia capture Kostyantynivka by June 30?

will-russia-capture-kostyantynivka-by-june-30-382-954-769 · Will Russia capture Kostyantynivka by...? · category: Geopolitics, Politics, Russia Capture, Ukraine, Ukraine Map, World · resolves
run_id: fe772851-1048-4a95-aee6-0bfac9754d52 · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
no_trade: action=OMIT
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
UP
current / peak
28.2% / 25.9%
move_start
36.5%
reversal
+2.3pp
move size / hours
10.6pp / 55.0h
shape
steady
72h range
25.9%—39.0% (Δ13.1pp)
since peak
3.0h

Price fell 10.6pp from 36.5% to 25.9% over 55.0h (steady), then reversed. Now at 28.2%, up 2.3pp from trough, 3.0h after the trough.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 37 → 4 quality: HIGH tokens: 4984
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
FAIR conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: None action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 12551 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = Russia advances on and captures Kostyantynivka by June 30; NO = front holds/Ukraine thwarts advances so city is not captured by the deadline. Trend is DOWN, pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=1, D=0, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=0, D=0 (priced-in: E=1, D=0). Self-check: no change. 
Theta direction: DOWN
Price move direction: DOWN (from 36% to 26%)
Alignment: SAME
Theta: DOWN — aligned
No Logical Divergence or Strong Divergence exists; there were no new E/D signals during the drop. The only location-specific item (“attempts by Russian occupiers to establish themselves on the approaches to Kostiantynivka using infiltration tactics,” May 2) supports ongoing offensive pressure but is priced-in and does not satisfy the capture criterion; the ISW daily and the North Korea support piece are general context, not ★ DIRECT evidence of imminent capture. With a near-term deadline and no fresh pro-YES signals, a steady 10pp decline is consistent with time decay rather than news-driven repricing, so the move is broadly justified and not a clear mean-reversion setup.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ no_trade: action=OMIT

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.