free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will the next diplomatic US-Iran meeting be in Pakistan?

will-the-next-diplomatic-us-iran-meeting-be-in-pakistan-295 · Where will the next US-Iran diplomatic meeting happen? · category: Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Israel x Iran, Khamenei, Nuclear, Politics, Trump, U.S. x Iran, Vance, nuclear deal, rewards 100, 4.5, 100 · resolves
run_id: 0eb842e1-0bb0-408a-b006-099d345e070c · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
no_trade: action=OMIT
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
DOWN
current / peak
68.3% / 70.3%
move_start
62.2%
reversal
+2.0pp
move size / hours
8.1pp / 36.5h
shape
spike
72h range
58.0%—70.3% (Δ12.3pp)
since peak
7.5h

Price rose 8.1pp from 62.2% to 70.3% over 36.5h (spike), then reversed. Now at 68.3%, down 2.0pp from peak, 7.5h after the peak. [Prior context: 24h ago: 61.4%, 72h range: 58.0%-70.3%]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 332 → 7 quality: HIGH tokens: 5517
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
FAIR conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: None action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v9.0_theta_v3 · 17985 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = next US–Iran diplomatic meeting takes place in Pakistan (e.g., Islamabad announced/scheduled); NO = next meeting occurs elsewhere or Pakistan plan falls through. Trend is UP, pricing in YES-World. Momentum check: E=1, D=3, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=1, D=3 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change. 
Theta direction: NEUTRAL
Price move direction: UP (from 62% to 70%)
Alignment: N/A
Theta: NEUTRAL — venue market
Logical Divergence: None (no Strong Divergence; opposing D<4 after deduping). The key venue-specific signal is multiple reports (WSJ-sourced) that US–Iran talks may resume next week in Islamabad, directly supportive of YES, while counter-signals (talks “stalled,” Iran reviewing with “no deadlines,” hardline pushback) reduce near-term timing confidence but do not point to an alternative venue. Given a credible venue report, an 8pp repricing is consistent with process-level but resolution-adjacent news; absent any verified denial or confirmation of a different location, the move is largely justified and the small pullback looks like normal digestion rather than a clear overreaction.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ no_trade: action=OMIT

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.

step post-omit

news watch (A.2 / A.3)

● executed
watch: 3ea835f1
status: ↻ reeval_fired (flipped_to_trade)
armed: 2026-05-09T15:55Z
closed: 2026-05-10T08:03Z
polls: 7
signals seen: 1809
decision price: 68.3pct
A.3 full re-evaluation
a38b3d7d @ 2026-05-10T08:03Z
outcome: plan_emitted action: NO assessment: OVERPRICED conviction: MEDIUM