free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will Paloma Valencia win the 2026 Colombian presidential election?

will-paloma-valencia-win-the-2026-colombian-presidential-election · Colombia Presidential Election · category: Colombia, Colombia Election, Elections, Global Elections, Main Election, Politics, Rewards 200, 4.5, 50, World, World Elections · resolves
run_id: 103148f1-28d0-44d6-b5df-ea96f17a83e2 · started · status completed · plan_emitted
view position ↗ ○ closed · MFE_GIVEBACK · +$1.05
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
UP
current / peak
15.7% / 12.2%
move_start
24.8%
reversal
+3.4pp
move size / hours
12.6pp / 79.5h
shape
spike
72h range
12.2%—21.9% (Δ9.7pp)
since peak
6.0h

Price fell 12.6pp from 24.8% to 12.2% over 79.5h (spike), then reversed. Now at 15.7%, up 3.4pp from trough, 6.0h after the trough.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 267 → 27 quality: HIGH tokens: 9423
article_thesis relevant
Encuestas sin democracia
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
UNDERPRICED conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: LARGE action: YES
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.7 · 16028 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = Paloma Valencia wins the 2026 presidential election; NO = any other candidate wins. Trend is DOWN, pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=0, D=0, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=0, D=0 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change.
Theta direction: NEUTRAL
Price move direction: DOWN (from 25% to 12%)
Alignment: N/A
Theta: NEUTRAL — no deadline
No verified election-specific signals justify the drop: there are no D9 items (no credible new polls against Valencia, no major institutional endorsements for opponents), no E9/E10 clusters, and the notable pieces are derivative (articles about Polymarket’s own shift), intra-right infighting commentary, and an opponent’s alleged assassination plot—none of which satisfy or directly advance the “will win” settlement criterion. Given a 12.6pp, 79.5h decline on process/coverage-only news, this looks like narrative/flow overshoot rather than fundamentals. The move is not supported by ★ DIRECT evidence, so it should partially mean-revert.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL