free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will no next Prime Minister of the United Kingdom be appointed in 2026?

will-no-next-prime-minister-of-the-united-kingdom-be-appointed-in-2026 · Next UK Prime Minister in 2026? · category: England, PM, Politics, Starmer, UK, World · resolves
run_id: 647db053-3c8c-4678-806b-5fe773820dc5 · started · status completed · plan_emitted
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
DOWN
current / peak
33.5% / 36.5%
move_start
22.2%
reversal
+3.0pp
move size / hours
14.3pp / 15.5h
shape
steady
72h range
13.0%—38.5% (Δ25.5pp)
since peak
8.0h

Price rose 14.3pp from 22.2% to 36.5% over 15.5h (steady), then reversed. Now at 33.5%, down 3.0pp from peak, 8.0h after the peak. [Prior context: 24h ago: 21.5%, 72h range: 13.0%-38.5%]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 334 → 27 quality: HIGH tokens: 9045
article_thesis relevant
How would a Labour leadership contest work?
gnews_indirect_evidence noise
Opinion | Britain’s Post-Liberal Disorder - The New York Times
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
OVERPRICED conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: LARGE action: NO
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v9.0_theta_v4 · 20601 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = no new UK Prime Minister is appointed in 2026; NO = a new PM is appointed in 2026. Trend is UP, pricing in the YES-world. Momentum check: E=0, D=1, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=0, D=1 (priced-in: E=0, D=3). Self-check: no change. 
Theta direction: NEUTRAL
Price move direction: UP (from 22% to 36%)
Alignment: N/A
Theta: NEUTRAL — appointment/leadership outcome market
Price rose while fresh news mainly added to resignation pressure (e.g., an ally renewing calls for Starmer to quit and the leadership crisis overshadowing the King’s Speech), which are D signals that make a 2026 appointment more likely and thus oppose the move. Critically, no ★ DIRECT step toward resolution occurred during the move window: no resignation announced, no formal leadership contest triggered, and certainly no new PM appointed; “defiant Starmer” items are rhetoric and largely pre-move. The 14pp steady rise on process/pressure without concrete progress is not justified and should partially mean-revert lower.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL