← back to pipeline
mr
Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026? ↗
billionaire-one-time-wealth-tax-passes-in-california-election-2026
· Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026? · category: Elections, Politics, Taxes, referendum, referendums midterms
· resolves
run_id: 6872e682-d9fb-4598-9d38-3424b2561c5c
· started
· status
completed
· plan_emitted
view position ↗
○ closed
· IDLE_TIME_CAPPED
·
+$4.55
signal detected
● executed
detect_reversal
direction
DOWN
current / peak
45.5% / 47.5%
move_start
37.5%
reversal
+2.0pp
move size / hours
10.0pp / 99.0h
shape
spike
72h range
37.5%—47.5% (Δ10.0pp)
since peak
5.0h
Price rose 10.0pp from 37.5% to 47.5% over 99.0h (spike), then reversed. Now at 45.5%, down 2.0pp from peak, 5.0h after the peak.
news gathered
● executed
news retrieval (tomographic)
raw→filtered: 25 → 5
quality: MEDIUM
tokens: 14910
gnews_indirect_evidence
direct
Billionaire-tax backers say they have enough signatures — times two — to qualify for ballot - Los Angeles Times
gnews_antithesis
direct
California Billionaire Tax Has Signatures Needed for Ballot, Backers Say - The New York Times
gnews_thesis
direct
California billionaire tax gathers enough signatures for November showdown - The San Francisco Standard
gnews_thesis
direct
Exclusive | California’s Billionaire Tax Has the Signatures to Make the Ballot, Backers Say - WSJ
gnews_indirect_evidence
noise
Sergey Brin confronted Gavin Newsom at a treehouse party — then launched a political war - Fortune
AI verdict
● executed
Prompt-MR · misprice analysis
OVERPRICED
conviction: MEDIUM
opportunity: SMALL
action: NO
override: OMIT_STRONG_ASSESSMENT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 13410 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = the one‑time billionaire wealth tax qualifies, appears on the 2026 ballot, and is approved by voters; NO = it fails to qualify or is rejected by voters. Trend is UP, pricing in the YES‑World. Momentum check: E=0, D=0, L=1 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=0, D=0 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change. Theta direction: NEUTRAL Price move direction: UP (from 38% to 48%) Alignment: N/A Theta: NEUTRAL — no hard-rule effect No Strong Divergence; this is a process-only spike with thin DIRECT momentum, so the move likely overshot. The only concrete development is backers saying they have enough signatures to qualify for the ballot (not an official qualification or a vote), which opens the pathway but does not meet the settlement criterion of “passes”; meanwhile, a high-profile opponent (Sergey Brin) mobilizing against it is an L6-style headwind. A 10pp jump on “we have signatures” claims (without official validation or polling/vote movement) is larger than the news justifies. Expect some reversion from the peak as the market digests that the critical hurdle remains voter approval in November.
rule audit
● executed
audit_gate
✓
ALL