free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will Andy Burnham be the next Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in 2026?

will-andy-burnham-be-the-next-prime-minister-of-the-united-kingdom-in-2026-882 · Next UK Prime Minister in 2026? · category: England, PM, Politics, Starmer, UK, World · resolves
run_id: 714d2e36-b3f0-4092-90af-f35098b02ad3 · started · status completed · plan_emitted
view position ↗ ○ closed · VERDICT_FLIP · +$18.92
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
DOWN
current / peak
37.1% / 39.3%
move_start
28.5%
reversal
+2.2pp
move size / hours
10.8pp / 12.5h
shape
spike
72h range
16.4%—39.3% (Δ22.9pp)
since peak
6.0h

Price rose 10.8pp from 28.5% to 39.3% over 12.5h (spike), then reversed. Now at 37.1%, down 2.2pp from peak, 6.0h after the peak. [Prior context: 24h ago: 28.4%, 72h range: 16.4%-39.3%]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 331 → 25 quality: HIGH tokens: 18657
article_thesis relevant
At a glance: Starmer grapples with leadership crisis
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
OVERPRICED conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: SMALL action: NO override: OMIT_STRONG_ASSESSMENT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v9.0_theta_v4 · 20986 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = Burnham secures a path to Westminster and wins the Labour leadership to become PM in 2026; NO = Starmer survives or another successor (not Burnham) becomes PM. Trend is UP, pricing in the YES-World. Momentum check: E=1, D=1, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=1, D=1 (priced-in: E=1, D=1). Self-check: no change.
Theta direction: NEUTRAL
Price move direction: UP (from 28% to 39%)
Alignment: N/A
Theta: NEUTRAL — no deadline alignment
No Strong Divergence: incremental news is mixed — one Burnham-specific step (Burnham “seeks path to Westminster” to launch a leadership challenge) versus counter-signals that Starmer is defiant and retains cabinet backing. The Politico report that Labour officials were backing away from blocking Burnham’s return (priced-in) and today’s “seeks path” piece are process steps, not resolution-level confirmation; they do not satisfy the settlement criterion of Burnham actually becoming PM. A 10pp+ spike on process-only, leadership-crisis coverage typically contains overshoot; with mixed incremental signals and no direct confirmation of Burnham’s entry to Parliament or leadership victory, part of the move should mean-revert.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL