free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

US x Iran diplomatic meeting by May 31, 2026?

us-x-iran-diplomatic-meeting-by-may-31-2026 · US x Iran diplomatic meeting by...? · category: Geopolitics, Iran, Iran Ceasefire, Politics, Trump, U.S. x Iran, Vance · resolves
run_id: 92f3fd61-dff3-4a6b-8193-41285e21f99d · started · status completed · plan_emitted
view position ↗ ○ closed · VERDICT_FLIP · +$8.47
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
DOWN
current / peak
41.5% / 44.5%
move_start
37.6%
reversal
+3.0pp
move size / hours
6.9pp / 13.0h
shape
spike
72h range
36.5%—49.5% (Δ13.0pp)
since peak
0.5h

Price rose 6.9pp from 37.6% to 44.5% over 13.0h (spike), then reversed. Now at 41.5%, down 3.0pp from peak, 0.5h after the peak. [Prior context: 24h ago: 45.0%, 72h range: 36.5%-49.5%]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 346 → 33 quality: HIGH tokens: 20439
article_precursor relevant
Iran bei der Fußball-WM: Was spricht dafür, was dagegen?
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
OVERPRICED conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: SMALL action: NO override: OMIT_STRONG_ASSESSMENT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 16080 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = a US–Iran diplomatic meeting is confirmed/held by May 31, 2026; NO = no such meeting is confirmed/held by then. Trend is UP, pricing in the YES-World. Momentum check: E=2 (new Iranian proposal via Pakistan/14-point plan; Oman-led mediation incl. Omani/Turkish FM coordination), D=3 (Trump signaling likely rejection/“not satisfied”; Iranian ultimatum/preconditions; Iranian envoy blaming US sincerity), L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=2, D=3 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change.
Theta direction: DOWN
Price move direction: UP (from 38% to 44%)
Alignment: OPPOSITE
Theta: DOWN — opposed
Price rose while net fresh signals slightly reduce the odds of a meeting, and critically no meeting was scheduled/confirmed; proposals and mediation are process-only, whereas Trump’s likely rejection and Iran’s ultimatum/preconditions are direct blockers under the settlement criterion of “a meeting occurs/confirmed.” Given mixed-to-bearish momentum and absence of a concrete scheduling step, the 6.9pp spike looks partially unjustified and is already retracing; expect some mean reversion.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL