free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will Donald Trump visit China on May 14, 2026?

will-donald-trump-visit-china-on-may-14-2026 · Will Trump visit China on...? · category: China, Geopolitics, Politics, Tariffs, Trade War, Trump, Trump-Xi, Trump-Xi Summit, rewards 100, 4.5, 100 · resolves
run_id: 9906253e-39d4-4e11-86ea-d9837da753ce · started · status skipped · planner_skipped · ✕ planner rejected
no_trade: action=OMIT
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
UP
current / peak
14.5% / 11.5%
move_start
17.5%
reversal
+3.0pp
move size / hours
6.0pp / 6.0h
shape
steady
72h range
10.0%—38.5% (Δ28.5pp)
since peak
0.5h

Price fell 6.0pp from 17.5% to 11.5% over 6.0h (steady), then reversed. Now at 14.5%, up 3.0pp from trough, 0.5h after the trough. [Prior context: 24h ago: 34.5%, 72h range: 10.0%-38.5%]

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 369 → 27 quality: HIGH tokens: 9210
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
FAIR conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: None action: OMIT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.7 · 17592 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = Trump is physically in China on May 14; NO = trip doesn’t occur that day (delay/cancellation/slip to another date). Trend is DOWN, pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=2, D=0, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=2, D=0 (priced-in: E=1, D=0). Self-check: no change.
Theta direction: DOWN
Price move direction: DOWN (from 18% to 12%)
Alignment: SAME
Theta: DOWN — aligned
No Strong Divergence: price fell despite supportive E, but only ~2 distinct incremental confirmations (e.g., “Trump Confirms China Visit, Hails Upcoming Xi Meeting” and a senior official saying he will visit Beijing next week), versus zero reports of postponement/cancellation. These items directly reinforce a May 14–15 timetable and satisfy the kind of evidence that would raise YES odds, but with the deadline days away, a downward repricing from time decay is rational and dominates. Net: the 6pp drop is justified by theta more than by news flow, so mean reversion is not compelled by these headlines alone.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL
trade plan

position_planner

○ skipped
✕ no_trade: action=OMIT

the deterministic planner rejected this trade. typical causes: poor R:R, spread exceeds gap, settlement danger zone, market too close to resolution. LLM assessment is above (Stage 6); planner is a pure-math gate layered on top.

step post-omit

news watch (A.2 / A.3)

● executed
watch: 7da57524
status: ↻ reeval_fired (flipped_to_trade)
armed: 2026-05-10T21:45Z
closed: 2026-05-11T01:19Z
polls: 2
signals seen: 1883
decision price: 14.5pct
A.3 full re-evaluation
7d3e0bf7 @ 2026-05-11T01:19Z
outcome: price_skipped action: YES assessment: UNDERPRICED conviction: MEDIUM