← back to pipeline
mr
Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026? ↗
billionaire-one-time-wealth-tax-passes-in-california-election-2026
· Billionaire one-time wealth tax passes in California election 2026? · category: Elections, Politics, Taxes, referendum, referendums midterms
· resolves
run_id: b0c31909-870d-40d0-9f5b-7a182e53c80c
· started
· status
completed
· plan_emitted
view position ↗
○ closed
· VERDICT_FLIP
·
−$3.89
signal detected
● executed
detect_reversal
direction
UP
current / peak
37.5% / 33.5%
move_start
43.5%
reversal
+4.0pp
move size / hours
10.0pp / 16.5h
shape
spike
72h range
33.5%—44.5% (Δ11.0pp)
since peak
1.0h
Price fell 10.0pp from 43.5% to 33.5% over 16.5h (spike), then reversed. Now at 37.5%, up 4.0pp from trough, 1.0h after the trough.
news gathered
● executed
news retrieval (tomographic)
raw→filtered: 28 → 1
quality: MEDIUM
tokens: 4449
AI verdict
● executed
Prompt-MR · misprice analysis
UNDERPRICED
conviction: MEDIUM
opportunity: LARGE
action: YES
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.7 · 12569 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = the billionaire one-time wealth tax qualifies for and passes on the November 2026 California ballot; NO = it doesn’t make the ballot or fails at the ballot. Trend is DOWN, pricing in NO-World. Momentum check: E=0, D=0, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=0, D=0 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change. Theta direction: NEUTRAL Price move direction: DOWN (from 44% to 34%) Alignment: N/A Theta: NEUTRAL — election/vote market No Logical or Strong Divergence exists because there were no incremental signals; the 16.5h, 10pp drop looks flow-driven with no fresh evidence. The only cited item — supporters claiming enough signatures for ballot inclusion — is a process step that neither satisfies “passes” nor arrived during the move window. With no new DIRECT or institutional signals to justify a 10pp repricing, the drop was unjustified and should partially revert.
rule audit
● executed
audit_gate
✓
ALL