free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Will Paloma Valencia win the 2026 Colombian presidential election?

will-paloma-valencia-win-the-2026-colombian-presidential-election · Colombia Presidential Election · category: Colombia, Colombia Election, Elections, Global Elections, Main Election, Politics, Rewards 200, 4.5, 50, World, World Elections · resolves
run_id: bcce0b2a-b6c0-4309-a86c-b287b919cc0b · started · status completed · plan_emitted
view position ↗ ○ closed · STOP_LOSS · −$5.51
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
UP
current / peak
39.6% / 37.5%
move_start
44.0%
reversal
+2.1pp
move size / hours
6.5pp / 20.0h
shape
steady
72h range
37.5%—44.7% (Δ7.2pp)
since peak
4.0h

Price fell 6.5pp from 44.0% to 37.5% over 20.0h (steady), then reversed. Now at 39.6%, up 2.1pp from trough, 4.0h after the trough.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 287 → 64 quality: HIGH tokens: 19772
article_thesis noise
El debate que Colombia necesita recordar
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
UNDERPRICED conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: SMALL action: YES override: OMIT_STRONG_ASSESSMENT
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 17098 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = Paloma Valencia wins the 2026 presidential election; NO = she does not. Trend is DOWN (44% → 38%), pricing in the NO-World. Momentum check: E=0, D=1, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=0, D=1 (priced-in: E=1 — runoff aggregator shows Cepeda’s edge evaporated/Paloma competitive; D=1 — Fecode endorses Cepeda). Self-check: no change. Theta direction: NEUTRAL
Price move direction: DOWN (from 44% to 38%)
Alignment: N/A
Theta: NEUTRAL — no deadline
No Logical Divergence or Strong Divergence exists; the incremental flow slightly favors a drop (Defensoría publicly denying a claim Valencia cited, which modestly harms her credibility), but there are no ★ DIRECT resolution-level signals like a new high-quality poll swing against Valencia, a major withdrawal/coalition against her, or institutional disqualification. A single minor-negative, debate-process-heavy news cycle does not justify a 6.5pp decline, and the partial rebound (+2.1pp) suggests overshoot; expect some mean reversion absent fresh, direct polling or structural setbacks.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL