free sign in →
← back to pipeline
mr

Iran closes its airspace by May 8?

iran-closes-its-airspace-by-may-8-754-861 · Iran closes its airspace by...? · category: Geopolitics, Iran, Politics, U.S. x Iran · resolves
run_id: c2c1c442-b1cd-4e82-8dcd-f873fcd8481f · started · status completed · plan_emitted
view position ↗ ○ closed · TAKE_PROFIT · +$39.68
signal detected

detect_reversal

● executed
direction
DOWN
current / peak
38.0% / 42.5%
move_start
20.5%
reversal
+4.5pp
move size / hours
22.0pp / 8.5h
shape
spike
72h range
11.5%—42.5% (Δ31.0pp)
since peak
0.5h

Price rose 22.0pp from 20.5% to 42.5% over 8.5h (spike), then reversed. Now at 38.0%, down 4.5pp from peak, 0.5h after the peak.

news gathered

news retrieval (tomographic)

● executed
raw→filtered: 306 → 72 quality: HIGH tokens: 22622
AI verdict

Prompt-MR · misprice analysis

● executed
OVERPRICED conviction: MEDIUM opportunity: LARGE action: NO
gpt-5 · prompt_2_misprice_v8.5.4 · 16067 tokens
Semantic Polarity: YES = Iran formally closes its airspace (e.g., nationwide NOTAM/official ban) by May 8; NO = no such closure is issued. Trend is UP, pricing in the YES-World. Momentum check: E=2, D=1, L=0 (R=0 unverified). Incremental only: E=2, D=1 (priced-in: E=0, D=0). Self-check: no change. 
Theta direction: DOWN
Price move direction: UP (from 20% to 42%)
Alignment: OPPOSITE
Theta: DOWN — opposed
No Strong Divergence: the news and price both lean higher, but the signals are indirect. The strongest items are UAE’s official claims of Iranian missile/drone attacks (raising retaliation risk) and an Iranian official saying another military attack is likely; neither is a DIRECT step toward Iran’s civil aviation authority closing the airspace, and there are no reports of Iranian NOTAMs, orders, or on-the-ground closure actions. Given zero resolution-adjacent, on-record closure steps, a 22pp spike on escalation-only context is an overshoot; some repricing is rational, but most of the move should mean-revert.
rule audit

audit_gate

● executed
ALL